chatgpt에게 물어보니, 질문에 맞는 대답은 아니지만, 어떻게든 결과물은 만들어내네요. 원래 코드의 의도를 이해한다는 점이 놀랍네요.
\documentclass[11pt]{standalone}
\usepackage{kotex}
\usepackage{mathtools}
\usepackage{tikz}
\usepackage{tkz-euclide}
\usetikzlibrary{calc,math,angles,positioning,intersections,decorations.markings,backgrounds}
\begin{document}
\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=1]
% Define the outer square
\path (0,0) coordinate (A);
\path (4,0) coordinate (B);
\path (4,4) coordinate (C);
\path (0,4) coordinate (D);
% Draw the outer square
\draw (A)--(B)--(C)--(D)--cycle;
% Define the coordinates of the inner square
\coordinate (E) at ($(A)!0.5!(B)$);
\coordinate (F) at ($(B)!0.5!(C)$);
\coordinate (G) at ($(C)!0.5!(D)$);
\coordinate (H) at ($(D)!0.5!(A)$);
% Draw the inner square
\draw (E)--(F)--(G)--(H)--cycle;
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{document}
KTUG 한국 텍 사용자 그룹
chatgpt에게 물어보니, 질문에 맞는 대답은 아니지만, 어떻게든 결과물은 만들어내네요. 원래 코드의 의도를 이해한다는 점이 놀랍네요.
\documentclass[11pt]{standalone}
\usepackage{kotex}
\usepackage{mathtools}
\usepackage{tikz}
\usepackage{tkz-euclide}
\usetikzlibrary{calc,math,angles,positioning,intersections,decorations.markings,backgrounds}
\begin{document}
\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=1]
% Define the outer square
\path (0,0) coordinate (A);
\path (4,0) coordinate (B);
\path (4,4) coordinate (C);
\path (0,4) coordinate (D);
% Draw the outer square
\draw (A)--(B)--(C)--(D)--cycle;
% Define the coordinates of the inner square
\coordinate (E) at ($(A)!0.5!(B)$);
\coordinate (F) at ($(B)!0.5!(C)$);
\coordinate (G) at ($(C)!0.5!(D)$);
\coordinate (H) at ($(D)!0.5!(A)$);
% Draw the inner square
\draw (E)--(F)--(G)--(H)--cycle;
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{document}